lunes, 16 de junio de 2014

OPERATIONAL PRINCIPLES FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT (2)


In addition to the method itself, there are other variables which come into play when defining the effectiveness of a managerial development program. After analyzing the best programs created by organizations and business schools for leadership development, the Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in Organizations –an independent body formed by experts from the academic world, the business world and the administration like Richard Boyatzis, Lyle Spencer or Daniel Goleman– concludes that managerial leadership is a process and as such it requires time and the need to consider competencies as the object of improvement. Furthermore, they construct a decalogue on what has to be done in order to achieve success in this field: (1) focusing on the competencies who have proved to be critical for success in the position; (2) evaluating a person’s competencies through an external, objective vision like 360º assessment; (3) identifying the personal weaknesses that will act as the foundations of the development process, apart from the improvement opportunities; (4) taking into account that we adults only learn when we have a motivation to do so (achieving our personal aims); (5) ensuring that development is self-guided; (6) focusing on realistic development objectives; (7) defining a clear action plan; (8) assuming that improving competencies takes time (it is impossible to achieve sustainable changes before 6 months have elapsed); (9) providing external support which can reinforce or encourage the sustained practice of new behaviors; and (10) measuring changes in competencies and performance using valid methods.

As we said above, it is not so important to have a ‘best practice’ which leads to the successful development of leadership as to implement whichever it is, but in a consistent way. Moreover, the search for the key operational principles which enable us to perform managerial development strategies which suit the requirements of the new economy environment may start from the demonstrated high-performance practices which have been functioning until the present day, but it cannot stop there, it must go beyond. Therefore, it is necessary to introduce new formats within the learning methodologies which permit the accelerated acquisition of competencies that make it possible to go from strategy to action as quickly as possible. Acceleration of expertise can be achieved when training is designed on the basis of human psychological learning processes (Colvin, 2008). These learning accelerators revolve around the guidelines that we are going to describe below.

domingo, 8 de junio de 2014

OPERATIONAL PRINCIPLES FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT (1)


Urgency in the workplace has had a dramatic impact on the velocity of business change. Companies in every industry, not just high-tech, need to accomplish more in less time. The response time available to fend off competitors is approaching zero. The best way for managers to add value is to reduce the time it takes employees to learn and apply the skills and information needed to compete in the new mercurial marketplace. Leadership development must be accelerated. The idea is to create and display ‘expertise’ more efficiently so that we can achieve the aims required by the increasingly demanding organizations. The traditional learning methods are no longer appropriate. The new economy leaders need to learn in different ways, deciding what to learn, when and how.

The method used to develop leadership within this display process becomes especially relevant. Training programs are commonly designed using multiple training techniques and multiple outcome measures (Conger & Benjamin, 1999). Among them, on-the-job training (93%) and external seminars (90%) have usually led the rankings of most frequently utilized methods (Saari, Johnson, Mclaughlin & Zimmerle, 1998). A wide variety of formal training programs are occurring in organizations: formal training continues to be the primary type of managerial leadership development intervention, while job assignment remains a close second (Collins, 2001). In recent times, development through job experiences, such as on-the-job-training, job-performance evaluations and feedback programs, participation in special projects or task forces, coaching or mentoring, job rotation, succession planning, and career planning have emerged as a powerful source of learning for managers (McCauley & Brutus, 1998). Other activities like action learning and 360-degree feedback are increasingly key elements of leadership development initiatives.

Despite this variety of methods and their evident influence on leadership programs, it was not easy to quantify the effectiveness corresponding to each one of them. It even seems that the choice of a type of method is not the most important thing. Day & Halpin (2001) found that the best organizations combined these techniques in some way or other, so that the most effective system actually seemed to be a function of the interdependence of several practices.